This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.Find out more here

GET INVOLVED

To discuss how you and your organisation can get more involved with The Work Foundation, please contact us.

Call 020 7976 3575 or email info@theworkfoundation.com

CONTACT

Big public jobs cuts must wait until private sector jobs recover

30 May 2010

Big public jobs cuts must wait until private sector jobs recover

The Work Foundation is launching a new policy prospectus today, calling for the government to construct a growth strategy based on expanding private sector jobs in all regions and countries of the UK, in order to tackle the deficit. Cut, Tax, Grow?, warns that until a recovery is in place, triggering big cuts in the public sector workforce would be counter-productive.

Ian Brinkley, Director of the Knowledge Economy programme at The Work Foundation said, “Much of the public debate and discussion has been on reducing the deficit through public spending cuts and tax rises. However, any successful deficit reduction strategy must encourage growth and jobs and this has so far received little attention in the public debate. The new government faces the challenge of tackling the UK’s very high public sector deficit while at the same time encouraging and supporting the fragile recovery by the private sector. The government must focus on growth as well as cuts.”

The first requirement is that enough new jobs in the private sector are generated in order to bring unemployment down. Total employment in the private sector was still falling according to the statistics available at the time of writing. This suggests the government should be wary of making big cuts in public sector employment before the private sector is hiring in sufficient numbers to take up the slack.

In the recession in the 1990s the public sector shrunk by around 14%, shedding more than 800,000 jobs. If the same level of public service reduction is repeated, job losses on the same scale could be expected over the next five years. Given that the current deficit is three times higher in this recession this is not an improbable outcome.

As well as cuts to the civil service and town hall staff, in the 1990s there were also big cuts in the nationalised industries, armed forces and local authority construction services. These can not be relied on to reduce the public sector headcount this time around. It will be harder to spare “ring-fenced” services such as health, education, social services and the police than in either the 1980s or 1990s cuts.

Ian Brinkley warned that, “Without more detail on the government’s plans for curbing public expenditure or raising taxation, it is difficult to offer an accurate assessment of likely job losses across the public sector. The government might choose pay freezes or pay cuts over redundancies for example.”

The pace of cut-backs in the public sector must also be sensitive to the impact on the regions. Ian Brinkley said, “A key objective must be to grow the private sector outside the South East. Economic activity in the UK became dangerously skewed towards excessive reliance on public sector job generation over the past decade: 70% or more of net job generation came from the public sector in much of the Midlands and North. This imbalance must be corrected, but at a pace and in a way that does not cripple the economic base in areas where the public sector represents the main source of high value knowledge intensive activity.”

Notes to editors
1. Ian Brinkley is available for interviews and briefings.
2. Note on figures for the 1990s recession: 1992-1997, historic ONS definition of the public sector including central and local government, public corporations, and HM Forces. Includes some transfers to the private sector.
3. The Work Foundation is the leading independent authority on work and its future. It aims to improve the quality of working life and the effectiveness of organisations by equipping leaders, policymakers and opinion-formers with evidence, advice, new thinking and networks.