This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.Find out more here


To discuss how you and your organisation can get more involved with The Work Foundation, please contact us.

Call 020 7976 3575 or email


Dr Neil Lee
Head of the socio-economic centre
T 020 7976 3611
Dr Neil Lee

Who takes the Credit?

Authors: Dr Neil Lee Dr Neil Lee

30 June 2011

Iain Duncan Smith spoke at The Work Foundation this morning, as part of our Bottom Ten Million research programme. He’s spent the last year revamping the benefits system and introducing a simplified, Universal Credit. Many have welcomed this. It was clear that the system needed simplification, and Universal Credit builds on the consensus that it’s important to make work pay. But there have also been complaints: a national system may work very differently across the country, and the impact on incentives is not as clear as sometimes portrayed.

The discussion in the media has focused on the winners and the losers. Some groups inevitably lose from benefits changes. In this case they range from single parents to those on middle incomes. Yet simplification has two big, under-reported benefits.

First, for those seeking to enter work it should be clearer what they gain or lose. This helps people avoid the benefits traps which might not exist in the equations, but persist in people’s minds when they don’t understand a complex system. If the Universal Credit is to be successful, it needs to be easy to explain in Job Centre Plus, and it looks like its going to be a lot easier than the old system (if still not exactly simple).

But second, it may also keep politicians honest. In the past, budget announcements on benefits have tended to be confusing and complicated to explain. Duncan Smith argued that the complexity of the system made it hard to assess what budgets were doing to those at the bottom end of the labour market, but that a simpler system will make it easier to assess this impact.

Past governments have tended to tinker, adding complexity to the system to reflect a complex labour market. These reforms at least start to address that complexity. But if government benefits from an opaque system, it’ll be interesting to see how long they stick with a simple one.

Comments in Chronological Order (Total 1 Comments)

fm transmitter smartphone

17 Jun 2012 2:56PM

Thanks for this wonderful post. Admiring the time and effort you put into your blog and detailed information.